AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900F
In this comparison, we analyze the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and Intel Core i9-13900F CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1% faster and 11% more expensive than Intel Core i9-13900F.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £458.99 | £409.14 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 50315 | 49598 |
| VALUE | 110 | 121 |
| SOCKET | AM5 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 120W | 65W |
| EFFICIENCY | 419 | 763 |
| CORES | 12 x 4.40 GHz | 8 x 2.00 GHz |
| TURBO | 5.60 GHz | 5.60 GHz |
| THREADS | 4126 | 4406 |
| DATE | Q1/2023 | Q1/2023 |
Intel Equivalent to AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-13900F | 49598 | £409.14 | |
| Intel Core i7-14700K | 52383 | £329 | |
| Intel Core i7-14700KF | 52420 | £326 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £529.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48335 | £458 |
Is AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D better than Intel Core i9-13900F?
When considering value for money, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-13900F by 10%.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 120 watts and a CPUMark score of 50315. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 419. The Intel Core i9-13900F efficiency score is 763. So, the Intel Core i9-13900F leads by 82%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.