Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core i9-13900KS
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core i9-13900KS CPUs. The Intel Core i9-13900F is 22% slower and 43% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900KS.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £409.14 | £585.99 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 49598 | 60641 |
| VALUE | 121 | 103 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1700 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 65W | 150W |
| EFFICIENCY | 763 | 404 |
| CORES | 8 x 2.00 GHz | 8 x 3.20 GHz |
| TURBO | 5.60 GHz | 6.00 GHz |
| THREADS | 4406 | 4712 |
| DATE | Q1/2023 | Q1/2023 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £529.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48335 | £458 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900KS
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 62382 | £594.59 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 51402 | £393.66 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 |
Is Intel Core i9-13900F better than Intel Core i9-13900KS?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i9-13900F offers a better deal than the Intel Core i9-13900KS by 15%.
The Intel Core i9-13900F is more energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 49598. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 763. The Intel Core i9-13900KS efficiency score is 404. So, the Intel Core i9-13900F leads by 47%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.