Intel Core i9-11900K vs Intel Core i9-14900F
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i9-11900K and Intel Core i9-14900F CPUs. The Intel Core i9-11900K is 88% slower and 45% cheaper than Intel Core i9-14900F.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £345.74 | £499.98 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 25040 | 47116 |
| VALUE | 72 | 94 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 125W | 65W |
| EFFICIENCY | 200 | 725 |
| CORES | 8 x 3.50 GHz | 8 x 2.00 GHz |
| TURBO | 5.20 GHz | 5.80 GHz |
| THREADS | 3511 | 4509 |
| DATE | Q1/2021 | Q1/2024 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-11900K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 8600G | 25293 | £149.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | 24304 | £142.92 | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | 26318 | £175.89 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-14900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48335 | £458 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £529.98 |
Is Intel Core i9-11900K better than Intel Core i9-14900F?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i9-11900K offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-14900F by 31%.
The Intel Core i9-11900K is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 125 watts and a CPUMark score of 25040. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 200. The Intel Core i9-14900F efficiency score is 725. So, the Intel Core i9-14900F leads by 262%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.