Intel Core i9-10900F vs Intel Core i9-14900KS
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i9-10900F and Intel Core i9-14900KS CPUs. The Intel Core i9-10900F is 203% slower and 191% cheaper than Intel Core i9-14900KS.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £216.72 | £629.99 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 20005 | 60550 |
| VALUE | 92 | 96 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 65W | 150W |
| EFFICIENCY | 308 | 404 |
| CORES | 10 x 2.80 GHz | 8 x 3.20 GHz |
| TURBO | 5.20 GHz | 6.20 GHz |
| THREADS | 3033 | 4827 |
| DATE | Q3/2020 | Q1/2024 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-10900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | 20324 | £108.97 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 8500G | 21598 | £129.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500 | 16091 | £59.98 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-14900KS
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 62382 | £594.59 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | 51402 | £393.66 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 |
Is Intel Core i9-10900F better than Intel Core i9-14900KS?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i9-10900F offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-14900KS by 4%.
The Intel Core i9-10900F is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 20005. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 308. The Intel Core i9-14900KS efficiency score is 404. So, the Intel Core i9-14900KS leads by 31%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.