Intel Core i5-12500 vs Intel Core i9-13900F

In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i5-12500 and Intel Core i9-13900F CPUs. The Intel Core i5-12500 is 149% slower and 150% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900F.

Specifications comparison

PRICE£163.97£409.14
CPU MARK1988049598
VALUE121121
SOCKETLGA 1700LGA 1700
TDP65W65W
EFFICIENCY306763
CORES6 x 3.00 GHz8 x 2.00 GHz
TURBO4.60 GHz5.60 GHz
THREADS36654406
DATEQ1/2022Q1/2023

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5-12500

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
20324
£108.97
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
21598
£129.98
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900F

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
50315
£458.99
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
50315
£529.98
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
48335
£458

Is Intel Core i5-12500 better than Intel Core i9-13900F?

When considering value for money, the Intel Core i5-12500 offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-13900F by 0%.


The Intel Core i5-12500 is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 19880. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 306. The Intel Core i9-13900F efficiency score is 763. So, the Intel Core i9-13900F leads by 149%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency


The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.