Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core i9-13900F
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i5-11600K and Intel Core i9-13900F CPUs. The Intel Core i5-11600K is 154% slower and 103% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900F.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £201.1 | £409.14 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 19528 | 49598 |
| VALUE | 97 | 121 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 125W | 65W |
| EFFICIENCY | 156 | 763 |
| CORES | 6 x 3.90 GHz | 8 x 2.00 GHz |
| TURBO | 4.90 GHz | 5.60 GHz |
| THREADS | 3344 | 4406 |
| DATE | Q2/2021 | Q1/2023 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5-11600K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | 20324 | £108.97 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 8500G | 21598 | £129.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500 | 16091 | £59.98 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £529.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48335 | £458 |
Is Intel Core i5-11600K better than Intel Core i9-13900F?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i5-11600K offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-13900F by 25%.
The Intel Core i5-11600K is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 125 watts and a CPUMark score of 19528. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 156. The Intel Core i9-13900F efficiency score is 763. So, the Intel Core i9-13900F leads by 389%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.