Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i5-13400F

In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i5-10600K and Intel Core i5-13400F CPUs. The Intel Core i5-10600K is 75% slower and 22% more expensive than Intel Core i5-13400F.

Specifications comparison

Intel Core i5-13400F
Buy on amazon
PRICE£183.9£142.97
CPU MARK1432225038
VALUE78175
SOCKETLGA 1200LGA 1700
TDP125W148W
EFFICIENCY115169
CORES6 x 4.10 GHz6 x 2.50 GHz
TURBO4.80 GHz4.60 GHz
THREADS29223635
DATEQ2/2020Q1/2023

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5-10600K

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
16064
£77.97
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
10962
£71.97

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5-13400F

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
25293
£149.99
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
24304
£142.92
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
26318
£175.89

Is Intel Core i5-10600K better than Intel Core i5-13400F?

When considering value for money, the Intel Core i5-10600K offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i5-13400F by 124%.


The Intel Core i5-10600K is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 125 watts and a CPUMark score of 14322. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 115. The Intel Core i5-13400F efficiency score is 169. So, the Intel Core i5-13400F leads by 47%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency


The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.