Intel Core i3-13100 vs Intel Core i9-13900K

In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i9-13900K CPUs. The Intel Core i3-13100 is 327% slower and 272% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900K.

Specifications comparison

Intel Core i9-13900K
Buy on amazon
PRICE£98.97£367.97
CPU MARK1372958576
VALUE139159
SOCKETLGA 1700LGA 1700
TDP60W125W
EFFICIENCY229469
CORES4 x 3.40 GHz8 x 3.00 GHz
TURBO4.50 GHz5.80 GHz
THREADS34614608
DATEQ1/2023Q3/2022

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i3-13100

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
16064
£77.97
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
10962
£71.97

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900K

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
62382
£594.59
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
51402
£393.66
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
50315
£458.99

Is Intel Core i3-13100 better than Intel Core i9-13900K?

When considering value for money, the Intel Core i3-13100 offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-13900K by 14%.


The Intel Core i3-13100 is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 60 watts and a CPUMark score of 13729. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 229. The Intel Core i9-13900K efficiency score is 469. So, the Intel Core i9-13900K leads by 105%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency


The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.