Intel Core i3-13100 vs Intel Core i9-10900F

In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i9-10900F CPUs. The Intel Core i3-13100 is 46% slower and 119% cheaper than Intel Core i9-10900F.

Specifications comparison

Intel Core i3-13100
Buy on amazon
PRICE£98.97£216.72
CPU MARK1372920005
VALUE13992
SOCKETLGA 1700LGA 1200
TDP60W65W
EFFICIENCY229308
CORES4 x 3.40 GHz10 x 2.80 GHz
TURBO4.50 GHz5.20 GHz
THREADS34613033
DATEQ1/2023Q3/2020

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i3-13100

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
16064
£77.97
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
10962
£71.97

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-10900F

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
20324
£108.97
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
21598
£129.98
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98

Is Intel Core i3-13100 better than Intel Core i9-10900F?

When considering value for money, the Intel Core i3-13100 offers a better deal than the Intel Core i9-10900F by 34%.


The Intel Core i3-13100 is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 60 watts and a CPUMark score of 13729. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 229. The Intel Core i9-10900F efficiency score is 308. So, the Intel Core i9-10900F leads by 34%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency


The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.