Intel Core i9-11900F vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i9-11900F and Intel Core Ultra 9 285K CPUs. The Intel Core i9-11900F is 207% slower and 140% cheaper than Intel Core Ultra 9 285K.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | $225 | $539 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 22080 | 67736 |
| VALUE | 98 | 126 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1851 |
| TDP | 65W | 125W |
| EFFICIENCY | 340 | 542 |
| CORES | 8 x 2.50 GHz | 8 x 3.70 GHz |
| TURBO | 5.20 GHz | 5.70 GHz |
| THREADS | 3414 | 5099 |
| DATE | Q2/2021 | Q4/2024 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-11900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 21916 | $134.85 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 8500G | 21598 | $149.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | 21540 | $116.98 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 9950X | 66028 | $599 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D | 70256 | $676 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 62474 | $501 |
Is Intel Core i9-11900F better than Intel Core Ultra 9 285K?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i9-11900F offers a worse deal than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K by 29%.
The Intel Core i9-11900F is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 22080. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 340. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K efficiency score is 542. So, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads by 59%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.