Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i5-11600K and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K CPUs. The Intel Core i5-11600K is 201% slower and 60% cheaper than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | $199 | $319 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 19528 | 58835 |
| VALUE | 98 | 184 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1851 |
| TDP | 125W | 125W |
| EFFICIENCY | 156 | 471 |
| CORES | 6 x 3.90 GHz | 8 x 3.90 GHz |
| TURBO | 4.90 GHz | 5.50 GHz |
| THREADS | 3344 | 4907 |
| DATE | Q2/2021 | Q4/2024 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i5-11600K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | 19715 | $139.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | 19329 | $82.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | 20324 | $185 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D | 56177 | $508.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | 62474 | $501 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X | 54637 | $398.99 |
Is Intel Core i5-11600K better than Intel Core Ultra 7 265K?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i5-11600K offers a worse deal than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 88%.
The Intel Core i5-11600K is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 125 watts and a CPUMark score of 19528. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 156. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K efficiency score is 471. So, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads by 202%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.