Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i9-10900K
In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i3-10320 and Intel Core i9-10900K CPUs. The Intel Core i3-10320 is 130% slower and 216% cheaper than Intel Core i9-10900K.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | $154.99 | $490 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 10010 | 23000 |
| VALUE | 65 | 47 |
| SOCKET | LGA 1200 | LGA 1200 |
| TDP | 65W | 125W |
| EFFICIENCY | 154 | 184 |
| CORES | 4 x 3.80 GHz | 10 x 3.70 GHz |
| TURBO | 4.60 GHz | 5.30 GHz |
| THREADS | 2838 | 3138 |
| DATE | Q4/2020 | Q2/2020 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i3-10320
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 4100 | 11053 | $68.97 | |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | 11622 | $67.48 | |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | 12660 | $150 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-10900K
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 21916 | $134.85 | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700 | 24304 | $175.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 8500G | 21598 | $149.99 |
Is Intel Core i3-10320 better than Intel Core i9-10900K?
When considering value for money, the Intel Core i3-10320 offers a better deal than the Intel Core i9-10900K by 28%.
The Intel Core i3-10320 is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 10010. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 154. The Intel Core i9-10900K efficiency score is 184. So, the Intel Core i9-10900K leads by 19%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.