Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i9-13900K

In this comparison, we analyze the Intel Core i3-10100 and Intel Core i9-13900K CPUs. The Intel Core i3-10100 is 577% slower and 315% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900K.

Specifications comparison

Intel Core i9-13900K
Buy on amazon
PRICE£88.67£367.97
CPU MARK865758576
VALUE98159
SOCKETLGA 1200LGA 1700
TDP65W125W
EFFICIENCY133469
CORES4 x 3.60 GHz8 x 3.00 GHz
TURBO4.30 GHz5.80 GHz
THREADS26164608
DATEQ2/2020Q3/2022

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i3-10100

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G
10962
£71.97
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
16064
£77.97
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
16091
£59.98

AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900K

NameCPU mark
Price
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
62382
£594.59
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
51402
£393.66
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
50315
£458.99

Is Intel Core i3-10100 better than Intel Core i9-13900K?

When considering value for money, the Intel Core i3-10100 offers a worse deal than the Intel Core i9-13900K by 62%.


The Intel Core i3-10100 is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 8657. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 133. The Intel Core i9-13900K efficiency score is 469. So, the Intel Core i9-13900K leads by 253%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency


The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.