AMD Ryzen 5 4600G vs Intel Core i9-13900F
In this comparison, we analyze the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Core i9-13900F CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is 209% slower and 425% cheaper than Intel Core i9-13900F.
Specifications comparison
| PRICE | £77.97 | £409.14 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU MARK | 16064 | 49598 |
| VALUE | 206 | 121 |
| SOCKET | AM4 | LGA 1700 |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| EFFICIENCY | 247 | 763 |
| CORES | 6 x 3.70 GHz | 8 x 2.00 GHz |
| TURBO | 4.20 GHz | 5.60 GHz |
| THREADS | 2659 | 4406 |
| DATE | Q3/2020 | Q1/2023 |
Intel Equivalent to AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-11400 | 16682 | £129.13 | |
| Intel Core i3-14100F | 15407 | £69.97 | |
| Intel Core i3-14100F | 15407 | £85.45 |
AMD Equivalent to Intel Core i9-13900F
| Name | CPU mark | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £458.99 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 50315 | £529.98 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | 48335 | £458 |
Is AMD Ryzen 5 4600G better than Intel Core i9-13900F?
When considering value for money, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G offers a better deal than the Intel Core i9-13900F by 41%.
The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is less energy-efficient considering its performance, with a power consumption of 65 watts and a CPUMark score of 16064. By comparing its benchmark score to its power consumption, we get an efficiency score of 247. The Intel Core i9-13900F efficiency score is 763. So, the Intel Core i9-13900F leads by 209%, making it the smarter choice in terms of power efficiency
The value score is calculated by comparing the benchmark score with the price.